| |
Gulag
Doctor bound
for Supreme Court
by Fintan
Dunne, 02 Jan '03
Editor www.SickofDoctors.com

The
US Supreme Court is to hear
a case described as the Roe v. Wade of free thought.
Dr. Charles Sell is incarcerated by a bizarre catch-22 which means
he cannot be tried until he agrees to take mind-altering drugs.
Court doctors have judged him insane for holding particular political
views and dissenting about AIDS causation, among other issues.
Dr. Sell won't take
court-ordered
antipsychotic medication
and has been incarcerated without trial for almost five years,
often in solitary confinement.
His alleged delusions include unorthodox views about the government's
handling of the Waco tragedy, the nature of the Bosnia conflict,
the causes of HIV/AIDS and other issues.
Sell is still
facing charges of health care fraud for allegedly filing numerous
false claims to Medicaid and private insurers for services that
were not provided.
GULAG DISSENTERS
Glen Boire, legal counsel for the Center for Cognitive Liberty
& Ethics (CCLE), says: "what's happening to Dr. Sell is unconscionable.
He is under no obligation to think the way the government wants
him to think, and the government should not be permitted to drug
him against his will."
Without the
freedom to control one's own consciousness," continues Boire,
"what freedom remains?"
According
to Boire, in the former Soviet Union, no equivalent to the First
Amendment existed. Prison officials could label dissident thinkers
"mentally ill" and forcibly drug them.
Boire notes, "If one vital objective of the Constitution is to
draw lines between freedom and totalitarianism, surely the interior
processes of the mind are protected against forcible invasion
and alteration by the government. Even the 8th Circuit Court agrees
that Dr. Sell is not a danger to himself or others.
The CCLE argues that the freedom of thought at stake in this case
is comparable to the reproductive freedom granted to women by
the Roe v. Wade decision. Just as Roe v. Wade established fundamental
bodily rights the body," notes Boire, this case will decide what
protections a person has over his or her own mind and thought
processes.
SUPREME COURT HEARING
In March 2002, a Federal Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
made a 2 - 1 split decision
which, in effect, established government power to forcibly medicate
a person with mind altering drugs even before trial.
Dissenting Circuit Judge Kermit Bye
argued that "the charges against Dr. Sell are not sufficiently
serious to forcibly inject him with antipsychotic drugs on the
chance it will make him competent to stand trial."
"Its a shocking, inhumane decision. Now, all the government needs
are allegations and a cooperative psychiatrist to forcibly drug
any citizen," said
Andrew Schlafly, General Counsel for the Association of American
Physicians and Surgeons (AAPS) which filed the amicus brief the
Supreme Court has agreed to review.
SickofDoctors.com
CURRENT
STORIES
Bee Gee Surgeon In Legal Suit
US Weather War A Global Threat
Top 100 Aids Inconstencies
Depleted Uranium it's NOT!
Gulag Doctor For Supreme Court
Smallpox and Bedbugs Linked
Rat Poison Killed 'Shaken Baby'
West Nile = Petrochemical Fever
PREVIOUS
STORIES
Mad Cows or Mad Scientists
Uncovering the Big Fat Lie
State of the Vaccine Nation
Real Causes of Mad Cows & Deer
What If It's All Been A Big FAT Lie?
Understanding Chemical Intolerance
What's Up With HIV, Please
Return of The Killer Bowel Drug
Michael J. Fox Sips Liquid Parkinsons
The Antidepressant Nightmare
Cord Clamping and Autism/ADD
Modern Medicine -New World Religion
Free
Subscribe to Sick of Doctors
Click for Private List eNewsletter
|
|